联系我们

【律师姓名】赵化律师

【联系方式:156-0714-9333(微信同号)

【执业证号】14201201010226533

【执业律所】:湖北东榆律师事务所

律所地址】武汉市东湖新技术开发区关山大道473号光谷新发展国际中心A座1508

友情提示:本律师不坐班,为方便接待您,来之前请您电话预约,谢谢!


【地铁路线】:乘光谷有轨电车L1、L3到“光谷天地站”下车

【公交路线】:乘公交车到“关山大道大彭村”或者“关山大道曙光村”或者“高新二路大彭村”或者“南湖大道大彭村”下车
您的位置:赵化律师网(赵化) > 律师文集
双语案例推送之涉侵权责任纠纷案例汇编
作者:赵化律师    访问次数:352    时间:2022/07/20

目录

Contents


1.刘秀平与北京永峰恒发商贸有限公司产品责任纠纷上诉案
Liu Xiuping v. Beijing Yongfeng Hengfa Commerce Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over product liability)

2.南宁振宁开发有限责任公司与陈永荣等与噪声污染责任纠纷案
Nanning Zhenning Development Co., Ltd. v. Chen Yongrong, et al. (case regarding dispute over liability for noise pollution)

3.李秀峰与李海龙机动车交通事故责任纠纷上诉案
Li Xiufeng v. Li Hailong (appeal case regarding dispute over liability for a motor vehicle traffic accident)


一、刘秀平与北京永峰恒发商贸有限公司产品责任纠纷上诉案


Liu Xiuping v. Beijing Yongfeng Hengfa Commerce Co., Ltd. (appeal case regarding dispute over product liability)


【裁判摘要】

根据《食品安全法》第一百四十八条的规定可知,消费者因不符合食品安全标准的食品受到损害,是生产者或者销售者承担“十倍赔偿”责任的前提。职业打假人购买假冒伪劣产品后,既未实际使用,亦未遭受损害,故其不具备适用十倍赔偿的前提条件。另外,职业打假人是以通过诉讼手段为自身牟利,以获得巨额赔偿为目的购买假冒伪劣产品的,其并不符合《消费者权益保护法》所保护的消费者身份。因此,其上述行为必然不会获得法院支持。


[Judgment Abstract]

In accordance with Article 148 of the Food Safety Law, the producer or the seller shall assume liability of a ten-fold compensation provided that the consumer has suffered loss from food failing to meet the food safety standards. Nevertheless, the ten-fold compensation liability does not apply where a professional anti-counterfeit fighter has neither actually used a counterfeit product nor suffered from any loss after the purchase of it. Besides, if the anti-counterfeit fighter buys the counterfeit product intentionally for seeking a profit through litigation, or obtaining a huge compensation, he or she is not defined as a consumer who should be protected by the Law on the Protection of Consumer Rights and Interests. Accordingly, the said act of the anti-counterfeit fighter will certainly not be supported by the people’s court.


【法宝引证码】CLI.C.10221547

[CLI Code] CLI.C.10221547 (EN)


二、南宁振宁开发有限责任公司与陈永荣等与噪声污染责任纠纷案


Nanning Zhenning Development Co., Ltd. v. Chen Yongrong, et al. (case regarding dispute over liability for noise pollution)


【裁判摘要】

目前,对住宅楼内设置的设备(含水泵)的噪声评价无专门标准,但这并不意味着水泵设施不会产生噪声污染或其噪声排放不受限制。水泵运转声音干扰他人正常生活、工作和学习并超过国家规定的环境噪声排放标准时,亦构成噪声污染。关于噪音排放标准,可以参照《社会生活环境噪声排放标准》关于营业性文化娱乐场所和商业经营活动中的规定进行认定。因此,开发商在住宅安置的水泵噪音超标,构成噪音污染的,应当对受害业主承担赔偿责任。


[Judgment Abstract]

So far, there haven’t been specific standards for rating the noise of the equipment (including water pump) installed in residential buildings, but this does not mean that water pump facilities will not produce noise pollution or its noise emission will not be limited. Where the sound of a running water pump disturbs the usual life, work and study of residents and exceeds the national standard for environmental noise emission, it can also be determined as noise pollution. The standards for noise emission can be determined by reference to the provisions on environmental noise pollution produced in profit-making cultural and entertainment centers and commercial activities stipulated in the Standards for the Emission of Noises in the Social and Living Environment. Therefore, developers of residential buildings should assume compensatory liability unto the injured owner if the noise of the pump placed in the residence exceeds the noise emission standard and causes noise pollution.


【法宝引证码】CLI.C.8533422

[CLI Code] CLI.C. 8533422 (EN)


三、李秀峰与李海龙机动车交通事故责任纠纷上诉案


Li Xiufeng v. Li Hailong (appeal case regarding dispute over liability for a motor vehicle traffic accident)


【裁判要旨】

雇员在从事雇佣活动中遭受人身损害,雇主应当承担赔偿责任。雇佣关系以外的第三人造成雇员人身损害的,赔偿权利人可以请求第三人承担赔偿责任,也可以请求雇主承担赔偿责任。雇主承担赔偿责任后,可以向第三人追偿。赔偿权利人起诉雇主获得赔偿后,再起诉雇佣关系以外的第三人的,不予支持。


[Judgment Abstract]

Where an employee suffers from a personal injury when carrying out an employment activity, the employer shall bear the compensation liabilities. If a third person beyond the employment relationship causes a personal injury to the employee, the obligee to compensation may claim against either the third person or the employer for bearing the compensation liabilities. The employer may, after bearing the compensation liabilities, claim compensation from the third person. After the obligee to compensation sues the employer and gets compensated, his further lawsuit against a third party beyond the employment relationship will not be upheld by the court.

  • 赵化律师品牌服务:刑事犯罪辩护 | 金融票据证券 | 债务经济合同 | 房产物业物权 | 更多
  • 版权所有©赵化律师网  鄂ICP备13006287号  鄂公网安备42010602001639号  联系我们
    地址:武汉市东湖高新技术开发区南湖大道116号川岚商业大厦1203室
    友情链接: 武汉律师事务所 武汉江岸区法院 武汉武昌区法院 武汉硚口区法院 武汉汉阳区法院 武汉青山区法院 武汉洪山区法院 武汉江汉区法院 武汉江夏区法院 武汉黄陂区法院 武汉新洲区法院 武汉东西湖区法院 武汉汉南区法院 武汉蔡甸区法院 武汉东湖新技术开发区法院